I've been trying NOT to cite the Wall Street Journal on health care lately because they are behind a pay-wall, and their news is usually available elsewhere. But David Wessel has some unusual insight into the politics of healthcare, and I just can't pass it up.
Wall Street Journal: What's Changed In the Protracted Health-Care Debate 2007-Apr-12, by David Wessel.
It would be easy to fill a column with the ways in which the health-care debate never changes. But, without offering optimism that a grand solution is imminent, three things are now apparent that -- if not new -- at least weren't widely appreciated 15 or 20 years ago.
Employer-based health insurance is slowly dying.
...even in a growing economy with a tight labor market, employer coverage is eroding. Fifteen years ago, says Joseph Antos of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, "large employers were concerned about rising health spending, but they were not leading the march to a big solution." Now they want out....
We don't know as much about medical science as we need to know.
It ...is increasingly clear that ignorance about what treatments work well and for whom is very costly, especially as new treatments are discovered and new technologies deployed. The flap over stents versus drugs for heart disease is only the latest example.... There is surprisingly little agreement on what works and what doesn't. There is, however, a consensus that figuring that out is important and getting the health-care system to make better use of information technology is crucial to that end.
Americans want a lot of health care, are willing to pay for a lot of it and don't like their choices limited.
Maybe this isn't exactly new, but it is more certain. Americans rebelled against managed care, and particularly didn't like employers forcing them to enroll. "One of the lessons of the '90s is that every consumer insists on the right to choose a poor-quality physician," Ronald Williams, chief executive of Aetna Inc., said.... So no matter how many experts prescribe big integrated health-care plans as the best way to get medical care, Americans won't be forced into them. Some may choose such plans, but they want choice -- and politicians won't enact legislation that denies them choice.